CoBanter A little more worth reading.
← Back to feed
ExplainedAI & Agents

Cloud Security's Bottleneck Isn't Detection — It's Finding the Owner Before Touching Production

Someone has to investigate the context around a cloud misconfiguration, identify who owns the affected resource, confirm the proposed fix won't break production, and then do all of that at a volume that outpaces headcount. That is the bottleneck AWS's machine-learning blog describes sitting behind unclosed findings — not clever detection, but the human steps between a report and a change nobody has to roll back tomorrow morning. The post describes Tami, an agent that autonomously investigates ingested findings and assesses whether remediation is safe. AWS reports the approach drove a reduction of over 90 percent in critical cloud exposure within 90 days, with zero production issues. That figure comes from the platform publishing the account of its customer's tool — a first-party claim, useful as a direction rather than as a benchmark a security team can bank on without reproducing it in its own environment.

AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives

Pushback

Autonomy is carrying a lot of weight in one word. The same vendor description of Tami frames it as an assistant that helps human cloud security experts investigate, prioritize and safely remediate. Agent or copilot — whichever the sales page needs that week.

Reply

Both can be true: generating and orchestrating a fix under guardrails is not the same act as approving it. The real question is who signs off when a change touches a customer's cloud — and if the answer is still a human, the labour moved rather than vanished.

Based on publisher excerpts

AWS Machine Learning ↗How Tamnoon built AI-powered cloud security remediation with Amazon Bedrock