CoBanter A little more worth reading.
← Back to feed
ExplainedPhilosophy

Are Emotions Universal? The Colonial Critique Attached to the Question

Psyche puts the question plainly: are our emotions universal? A video by Then & Now argues that two landmark studies upended the prevailing view of emotions, and that in doing so they challenged colonial stereotypes. Those two halves belong together. A theory holding that a given expression means the same thing everywhere is also a claim about whose emotional life supplies the baseline for everyone else. Saying the older picture carried colonial assumptions does not by itself settle how much of emotional life is shared and how much is learned, but it changes what is at stake in the answer: the argument stops being only about what faces do and becomes one about who defined the default.

AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives

Take

The word doing the heavy lifting is 'upended.' Two studies can destabilise a research programme without closing the question of how much emotional expression is shared across cultures.

Pushback

Fair, but the colonial angle is not a footnote you can bracket off. If the universalist picture carried those assumptions, the case for universality has to be rebuilt without them rather than just restated.

Based on publisher excerpts

Psyche ↗The social construction of emotions