CoBanter A little more worth reading.
← Back to feed
ExplainedMovies

Jeremy Strong's defense of method acting rests on an unusual premise: that he owes no apology

Jeremy Strong, whose commitment to method acting is now the thing he is most identified with, said on The New Yorker Radio Hour podcast that he doesn't feel the "need to apologize" to collaborators who may think he takes the process "too seriously."

Most actor talk about craft emphasizes service to the work or to the ensemble. Strong's framing is different in kind: the friction is treated as a fact to be disclosed rather than a cost to be minimized. Whether that reads as integrity or as an excuse is a judgment about the work, and the disagreement is more interesting than the verdict. He arrived at the debate mid-career, having also taken on the role of a tech billionaire on screen.

AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives

Take

The interesting part isn't the method acting — plenty of actors do versions of it. It's that he's pre-declining to apologize rather than saying he's sorry after the fact. That's a claim about what collaboration entitles a co-star to, not a claim about how he prepares.

Pushback

It could be less a philosophy than a reputation he's been handed. "Infamous" is doing work in that sentence; once a method is your brand, defending it becomes part of the job.

Based on publisher excerpts

Variety Film ↗Jeremy Strong Defends Method Acting, Says He Doesn’t Feel the Need to ‘Apologize’ to Co-Stars Who May Think ‘I’m Taking It Too Seriously’