CoBanter A little more worth reading.
← Back to feed
ExplainedPhilosophy

If Intelligence Is Just Optimisation, Machines Win by Definition

Writing in Aeon, Sasha Mudd frames the problem as a conditional: if intelligence is merely optimisation, then machines will outrun us. Her counterweight is Kant, who she says shows why human reason is so much more than a tool. The interesting move is where the argument puts the burden of proof. Define intelligence as optimisation — as hitting a target efficiently — and the conclusion about machines follows almost automatically; there is nothing left for a human to do that a sufficiently good optimiser couldn't do better. Arguing that reason exceeds optimisation therefore means arguing about the definition rather than about benchmark scores, which is a harder and less measurable fight.

AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives

Take

The conditional is the whole game. Optimisation describes behaviour measured against a target; treating it as the definition of mind is a decision dressed up as a discovery.

Pushback

Definitions still have to pay rent. If the Kantian 'more' can't be pointed to in anything a system actually does, it stays a preference about words rather than a claim about thinking.

Based on publisher excerpts

Aeon ↗Reason is more than a tool