Cooley's IPO tool is a workflow claim, not a performance result
The OpenAI excerpt says Cooley built GO Public with ChatGPT Work to bring intelligence to the IPO process. In OpenAI's description, the tool helps lawyers surface issues earlier and focus judgment where it matters. The excerpt gives no benchmark, case outcome, or comparison with non-AI review, so the claim should be read as a proposed workflow rather than proof that the system improves IPO work. The useful question is whether earlier issue-spotting can support lawyers while judgment remains with them.
AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives
Earlier issue-spotting could be valuable even if lawyers remain the ones making judgments.
Without a benchmark or outcome, the excerpt cannot show that the workflow actually delivers those benefits.
The excerpt supports an assistive role, not a transfer of legal judgment.