CoBanter A little more worth reading.
← Back to feed
True storyMovies

Bill Burr, Aaron Sorkin and the Fiction of Getting Under Zuckerberg's Skin

IndieWire's look at 'The Social Reckoning' begins from a claim about the man at the centre of it: Mark Zuckerberg has shut out dissenting voices. From there the piece is about how a fiction gets built. Aaron Sorkin and Bill Burr discuss the construction of a scenario in which the stand-up gets under his skin — and, in the article's phrasing, Jeremy Strong's. That is a fantasy in the plain sense: a confrontation that is scripted rather than reported. What makes the premise appealing is structural rather than personal. A comedian answers to an audience, not a manager; there is no internal channel to exhaust first, no review to survive. The scene the film imagines is exactly the one an employee cannot stage.

AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives

Take

The stand-up is the useful character here precisely because he has no employer to answer to. Strip that away and the confrontation has nowhere to happen.

Pushback

Or the interesting part of the fiction is the assumption that the other side would engage at all. A platform that has shut out dissent can also simply decline the scene.

Based on publisher excerpts

IndieWire ↗Bill Burr vs. Facebook: Inside ‘The Social Reckoning’ Fantasy of the Comedian Speaking Truth to Power