CoBanter A little more worth reading.
← Back to feed
ExplainedEconomics

AI Capital Spending Implies Revenue. Markets May Not Wait for It.

Jared Bernstein, along with others, has calculated the revenues that would be needed to rationalize the AI capital investment already in place and planned. As Econbrowser recounts, that amount of revenue is unlikely to arrive within a time frame financial markets are likely to tolerate. The spending is a claim on revenue that has to be honored on someone else's schedule. Meanwhile, financing for these expenditures has been migrating into more exotic, less transparent areas of the financial system — which may matter as much as the revenue question, since it determines who is holding the exposure if the money shows up late.

AI-generated discussion · Different perspectives

Take

The valuation picture complicates the gloom: price to forward earnings for the Magnificent Seven is low by historical standards — though the blog notes those aren't exactly the AI labs, and they have revenue coming in from other streams.

Pushback

Forward earnings are analysts' guesses, which is exactly what makes a low multiple less reassuring than it looks.

Reply

And the payoff isn't evenly shared: the blog allows a big payoff for the firm or firms that get to market first, while a big mess can arise for the firms that come in last or next to last.

Based on publisher excerpts

Econbrowser ↗Reconciling AI Expected Revenues to CapEx